Cost by Size / 1-Employee S-Corp
Payroll cost for a 1-employee S-corp: the owner-only math
S-corp owners running W-2 payroll for themselves face an awkward pricing dynamic. Most major payroll providers price as base fee plus per-employee fee, which is calibrated for businesses with 5 to 50 employees and treats the 1-employee setup as an afterthought. This page works through what each major provider actually costs for the single-employee S-corp, why Patriot Software wins on raw price, and when paying more for Gusto or OnPay is worth it.
Six options for 1-employee S-corp payroll
Pricing as of 16 May 2026 from each vendor's published pricing page. Annual cost assumes 12 monthly bills. The Square Payroll Contractors option is included for completeness but is the wrong tool for S-corp W-2 payroll.
| Option | Monthly | Annual | Notes |
|---|---|---|---|
| Gusto Simple | $55 | $660 | Full-service payroll, tax filing, year-end W-2. Easiest to set up for non-experts. |
| OnPay | $55 | $660 | Same price as Gusto Simple, slightly faster customer service. Month-to-month. |
| QuickBooks Payroll Core | $51 | $612 | $45 base + $6 per employee. Wins by $4/month if you already use QuickBooks Online. |
| Patriot Software | $27 | $320 | $17 base + $4 per employee for Basic Payroll (no tax filing) or $37 base for Full Service. |
| Square Payroll (Contractors) | $6 | $72 | Only $6 per contractor, no W-2 support. Wrong tool for an S-corp owner since you need W-2. |
| DIY (no software) | $0 | $0 | Free to do manually but requires understanding quarterly 941, annual 940, state UI, W-2/W-3, year-end reconciliation. Real cost is 4-8 hours per year of your time plus IRS penalty risk. |
Why the S-corp owner-only setup is genuinely different
S-corp owners running payroll for themselves are the smallest possible payroll customer and have specific needs that differ from a 2-employee small business. The owner is also the bookkeeper, the HR department, and the compliance officer. The payroll software is one tool in a stack that already includes accounting, tax planning, and a CPA relationship. The features that matter most are reliability of tax filing, clean year-end W-2, and the ability to defer to a CPA without friction.
What does not matter much for this profile: HR features, time tracking, benefits administration, multi-state payroll (most S-corp owners are single-state), employee self-service portal (the owner is the only employee). This is why Patriot Software's stripped-down product wins on price: it focuses exclusively on what this customer needs and skips everything else. Gusto and OnPay sell the same payroll function plus a lot of features the owner-only setup will not use.
The honest case for paying $20 to $30 per month more for Gusto or OnPay over Patriot: brand recognition for accountant integration (most CPAs are familiar with Gusto's reports), better mobile app, faster customer service if something goes wrong, cleaner integration with downstream accounting tools. For most S-corp owners these are worth the modest premium, but they are not transformative.
The reasonable compensation question
The most consequential decision for an S-corp owner is not which payroll provider to use, it is what salary to pay yourself. The IRS requires reasonable compensation for services performed, and that figure determines how much income flows through W-2 wages (subject to 15.3 percent FICA on both employee and employer portions, paid by the S-corp) versus distributions (not subject to self-employment tax).
For most professional services owners, reasonable compensation lands in the $50,000 to $120,000 range based on what a non-owner employee with similar skills would earn. A software development consultant generating $200,000 in S-corp revenue might set salary at $80,000 and take $120,000 in distributions, avoiding self-employment tax on the $120,000 distribution portion. A high-revenue consultant generating $400,000 might set salary at $130,000 and take $270,000 in distributions.
The IRS audit risk is genuine. Setting salary too low (say $30,000 on a $300,000 revenue business) attracts scrutiny and possible reclassification of distributions as wages, plus penalties. Most CPAs recommend documenting the reasoning for the salary level with reference to industry compensation data, role responsibilities, and time spent. The payroll provider does not make this decision, the CPA does.
Patriot Software vs Gusto: the honest comparison
For a 1-employee S-corp with a $75,000 salary paid bi-weekly, Patriot Software Full Service at $41 monthly handles every payroll function: calculate gross to net, withhold federal income tax, withhold and match FICA, file quarterly 941, file annual 940 and W-2, handle state UI registration and filing. Annual cost is $492. Gusto Simple at $55 monthly does the same plus offers benefits brokerage, 401(k) integration through Guideline, and a more polished interface. Annual cost is $660.
The $168 annual difference is real but small. For an S-corp owner paying themselves $75,000, that is 0.22 percent of salary. The decision is essentially whether the slight interface and brand advantage of Gusto is worth $168 per year. For owners who plan to use Gusto's benefits brokerage to set up an individual market health plan or want the 401(k) integration for solo 401(k) administration, Gusto is the better choice. For owners who already have health insurance figured out and are just buying a payroll execution tool, Patriot is the better economic choice.
The DIY option, examined honestly
DIY payroll for an S-corp owner is mechanically possible and saves $500 to $700 per year versus full-service options. The steps: calculate gross to net using a free payroll calculator each pay period, deposit federal taxes via EFTPS, deposit state taxes through your state's portal, file Form 941 quarterly (due end of January, April, July, October), file Form 940 annually (due January 31), prepare and file W-2 plus W-3 annually (due January 31), handle state UI quarterly filings.
Total time investment for an experienced bookkeeper is 4 to 8 hours per year. For an S-corp owner who is not an experienced bookkeeper, it is more like 10 to 20 hours per year plus the risk of penalty for missing deadlines (the IRS penalty for late 941 deposits starts at 2 percent and escalates to 15 percent of the deposit). Most CPAs do not recommend DIY for S-corp owners. The math favours paying $50 per month for someone else to handle it unless your hourly value is genuinely low.
What changes when you add a second employee
Moving from 1 employee to 2 changes the math in two ways. First, the per-employee fee doubles on every major provider: Gusto Simple goes from $55 to $61 monthly, OnPay from $55 to $61, Patriot Full Service from $41 to $45. The cost differences between providers stay roughly the same in absolute dollars but compress as a percentage.
Second, the operational complexity increases substantially: handling W-4s for a non-owner employee, complying with state new-hire reporting, withholding and remitting employee FICA, providing workers' comp coverage in states that require it for non-owner employees, possibly providing benefits. At 2 employees, the case for full-service Gusto or OnPay over Patriot strengthens because the complexity is no longer pure DIY-territory simple. See the 5-employee cost guide for the next size band.
Where to go next
Payroll cost for 5 employees
The next size band where the math changes meaningfully.
Gusto cost
The most common upgrade from Patriot once you hit 3+ employees.
DIY vs outsourced payroll
Full breakdown of when DIY makes sense and when it does not.
Contractor / 1099 cost
If you are weighing W-2 employment vs contractor structure.